Agreement score
100%
On target
10 positive · 0 neutral · 0 negative
Classic NPS
100
On target
1 promoters · 0 passive · 0 detractors
Competence
10 / 10
On target
Q4 — representatives demonstrate strong competence
Overall usefulness
10 / 10
On target
Q11 — delivery was useful to us
Score per question · 2026 vs 2025
Year on year
202581.3% · 102 responses
2026100% · 1 responses
Question detail
Q3Relokator's digital project tools were useful for the project1 answers10/10100%
+85.5
Q4Relokator's representatives demonstrate strong competence1 answers10/10100%
+5.4
Q5Project planning deadlines were met1 answers10/10100%
+5.8
Q6We received good support from Relokator1 answers10/10100%
+5.6
Q7Relokator contributed to good project planning1 answers10/10100%
+5.6
Q8Relokator ensured staff received good information about the relocation project1 answers10/10100%
+38.9
Q9Relokator ensured the move was completed according to schedule1 answers10/10100%
+9.1
Q10Relokator provided good information regarding cost changes1 answers10/10100%
+29.6
Q11Overall, Relokator's delivery was useful to us1 answers10/10100%
+0
Q12Based on my experience, I would confidently recommend Relokator to others1 answers10/10100%
+0
Recommendation question Q12 scored 100% on the agreement scale.
Strategic value (1–10 scale)
Relokator reduced risk in the project9/10
Relokator safeguarded patient safety and operations throughout9/10
Relokator contributed to speed of operational readiness9/10
Relokator freed up our own time and resources9/10
Our staff adopted the new premises quickly9/10
Overall value of Relokator's delivery9/10
How clients found us and why they chose us
How did you first come into contact with Relokator?
previous1
What were the most important reasons for choosing Relokator? (choose up to 3)
competence1